75% of CVs are rejected by ATS before a human reads them

Your CV scored in 10 seconds.
Not by a friend. By the criteria that matter.

Five categories. ATS compliance check. Missing keywords. Specific phrasing fixes. Built for Goldman Sachs, McKinsey, Clifford Chance, and every top UK graduate employer. Upload your CV and try it now.

Analyse my CV for free

Free for 3 days · Cancel anytime

CV Analysis

Drop your CV here

Supports PDF and Word documents (.docx)

5 category breakdown ATS compliance check Specific phrasing fixes

Calibrated for applications to

Goldman SachsJ.P. MorganMorgan StanleyMcKinseyBCGBainDeloittePwCEYKPMGClifford ChanceLinklaters

Why your CV gets rejected before a human reads it

At firms like Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, and McKinsey, a single graduate role receives 3,000-10,000 applications. Recruiters spend an average of 7.4 seconds on each CV that makes it past the initial screen. But most CVs never reach a human — they are filtered out by Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) that scan for specific keywords, formatting conventions, and section structures.

The most common reasons graduate CVs fail ATS screening are invisible to the applicant: tables that break text extraction, headers placed in text boxes that get ignored, non-standard section labels, and missing industry-specific keywords. A CV that reads well visually can score zero in an ATS because the system cannot parse its structure.

Beyond ATS, the CVs that do reach human reviewers are judged against a specific set of criteria: quantified achievements (numbers, percentages, deal values), action verbs that demonstrate ownership ("led" not "helped"), relevant technical keywords for the target sector, and a clean single-page format that follows investment banking and consulting conventions.

Intervyo's CV analysis scores your CV against these exact criteria — the same ones used by recruiters at Goldman Sachs, McKinsey, and Clifford Chance. Five categories, each with a score and specific reasoning, plus an ATS compliance check, missing keywords, and phrasing improvements that show you exactly what to change.

5 categories scored

What gets scored — and why it matters

Each category maps to what recruiters at top firms actually evaluate when screening graduate CVs.

Avg: 62

Layout & Structure

Section ordering, whitespace, readability, and adherence to conventions expected by top-tier employers. Single page, reverse chronological, consistent formatting.

Avg: 48

Quantified Impact

"Increased revenue by 23%" beats "Helped with revenue growth." Numbers, percentages, deal values, and team sizes demonstrate real contribution rather than vague involvement.

Avg: 55

Industry Relevance

Does your CV use the right keywords for your target sector? ATS systems and human reviewers scan for specific technical terms, tools, and domain knowledge.

Avg: 68

Academic Depth

How well you present your education — grades, relevant modules, dissertation topics, academic awards. For graduate applications, this section is scrutinised heavily.

Avg: 52

Role Alignment

How well your experience, skills, and framing match the specific role and firm. A CV tailored for Goldman reads differently from one targeting Clifford Chance.

Pass/Fail

ATS Compliance

Formatting issues that cause automated rejection — invisible tables, headers in text boxes, missing standard sections, non-standard fonts, and multi-column layouts that break text extraction.

Sector-specific

Common CV mistakes by sector

Every sector has specific expectations. What works for consulting does not work for law.

No quantified deal experience or transaction values

Missing financial modelling or valuation keywords

Using passive language ("assisted with" instead of "built" or "led")

Education section buried below irrelevant work experience

No mention of relevant software (Bloomberg, Capital IQ, FactSet)

ATS screening

What ATS systems check — and what breaks them

What passes ATS

  • Standard section headings (Education, Experience, Skills)
  • Single-column layout with no tables
  • Standard fonts (Calibri, Arial, Times New Roman)
  • Reverse chronological order
  • Dates in consistent format (MMM YYYY)
  • Industry keywords matching the job description

What breaks ATS

  • Tables or multi-column layouts
  • Headers and footers containing key info
  • Text boxes or graphics
  • Non-standard section labels
  • Images, logos, or icons
  • Unusual file formats (.pages, .odt)

Compare your options

CV review: your options

FeatureIntervyoChatGPTFriend / PeerCareer Service
5-category scoring
ATS compliance check
Missing keyword analysisSometimes
Phrasing improvementsGenericSometimes
Sector-calibrated criteriaVaries
One-click DOCX rewrite
Available instantly
Consistent scoring
Unlimited reviews

How it works

Upload. Score. Rewrite. Under a minute.

Step 1

Upload your CV

PDF, DOCX, or paste text. Select your target role and sector for calibrated scoring.

Step 2

Get your scored report

Five categories scored with reasoning, ATS compliance check, missing keywords, and specific phrasing fixes.

Step 3

One-click rewrite

Intervyo rebuilds your CV in elite IB format as a downloadable DOCX. Same content, professional structure.

FAQ

CV analysis questions

Your CV is the first thing they see.
Make sure it gets through.

75% of CVs are rejected by ATS. The ones that get through are structured, quantified, and keyword-optimised. Score yours in 10 seconds.

Analyse my CV for free

Free for 3 days · Cancel anytime